The
problems in the Middle East just won’t go away.
When Rosie and I were in Israel and Palestine a few years ago, there was
an obvious strain in the relationship that the Israelis had with the
Palestinians. The Palestinians had
different license plates and there were many check points on the roads that they
could not go through. In the West Bank,
there were numerous places where settlers were reclaiming territory that they
thought had been given to them by God and that the Palestinians had no claim to
the territory at all. This attitude
strained relationships beyond any tolerance and there were frequent violent
clashes. In Northern Jordan, we visited
a Palestinian refugee camp filled with people who had lost their homes. Their fears and disappointments were quite
obvious.
When Jesus was given a coin and
asked if it was right to pay taxes to Caesar, Jesus asked whose picture was on
the coin. When the people answered that
it was Caesar’s picture, Jesus told them to give to Caesar what belonged to
Caesar, and to give to God what belonged to God. He didn’t tell them to not pay the taxes, he
simply told them to get their priorities straight. If we could pay more attention to what God
wants, which is for us to love one another as we are loved by God and not try
to make everyone over in our own image, we might discover that the answers that
seem to elude us are much easier to find.
I am intrigued by the Book of Ruth
and the wonderful integration of the cultures that it represents. Ruth was a Moabite. That probably means little to you, but the
Moabites were created when the daughters of Lot found their father drunk in a
cave following the escape from Sodom when their mother was turned into a pillar
of salt because she looked back at the destruction of the town. The daughters each got pregnant by their
drunken father at their own insistence.
The eldest daughter gave birth to a child named Moab, who became the
leader of the tribe that eventually produced Ruth. The remarkable nature of the story is that in
due course, Ruth married Boaz and they produced a baby named Obed who became
the father of Jesse, who was the father of David, the great King of
Israel. There was a fully integrated
family that came from both the tribes of the Moabites and the Hebrews. That integration served them all very well
when the opposition was from the Babylonians and the Assyrians. It is harder to see today when the opposition
is from the God given-ness of the Jewish state and the Arab people who have
lived in the area for centuries.
I am convinced that there isn’t much that you
and I can do to fix this mess. We can
only keep it in our prayers and our hearts and hope that by God’s infinite
grace this problem will find a solution.
Simplicity seems to me to be a better place to start than the wielding
of power.
In Mark’s Gospel, Jesus talks about
the Scribes, the religious leaders, who
like to walk about in long robes and take the best seats at all of the
gatherings. He says that they will, in
the end, receive condemnation. He
watches as people put money into the treasury.
He sees the rich people put in large sums very ostentatiously. Then a poor widow comes and puts into the
treasury two small copper coins that are worth a penny. He tells his disciples that this woman has
contributed more than any of the others because they have given out of their
surplus, but she has given all that she has.
This is a wonderful sermon about simplicity; how less is often worth
much more.
I know that is true for you and me also. It is also probably true about the problems
that affect so much of our world. We
complicate them with our egotistical need to control and to fix. What separates most people is their need to
be right and for those who oppose them to be wrong. That is certainly true in our politics. Blame and finger pointing seem to substitute
for relevant conversation about what we need to do in this world. When we can remove our egos from the
argument, it is always easier to find answers.
That, I believe, is what Jesus is telling his disciples and what he is
telling us.
One of the prime reasons for our
involvement in the Middle East has been a strong desire to plant democracy in
those different nations. That is what we
had in mind in Iraq, in Libya and certainly what we hoped for in Syria. Obviously, that isn’t happening. Those countries have their own tribal
governments that have no desire at all to have what we call democracy. They are simply tribes struggling in their
own areas to keep their own control. Our
vision for these people is much too large for them to understand what we have
in mind, and more the problem, it is our vision, not theirs. I wonder if we would learn to listen more and
talk less that we might be able in this world to find more inclusive answers to
the questions that confront us.
No comments:
Post a Comment