There is a case before the
Supreme Court that is trying to argue that corporations have the right to
express their own religious beliefs, and not obey the provisions of the
Affordable Care Act that provide for contraception for employees. Lawyers are arguing that the corporation,
Hobby Lobby, which was created by evangelical Southern Baptists ought to be
able to practice their religious beliefs in the context of the contracts that they
have with those who work for them.
There are those who hold their
religion above all things, regardless of what needs there may be around
them. I have always been appalled at the
way that some Christians use their religion to allow or forbid things that the
rest of society needs. Their blindness
is what is appalling here. It ought not
to be hard for the Supreme Court to decide this issue; but I suspect that with
their extreme conservative bent, it will become a very difficult choice for them
indeed.
In many ways, this is the same kind of argument that was
used in the Citizen’s United case, when corporations were held to have the same
rights as individuals, and were thus able to contribute unlimited amounts to
candidates for political office. This
ruling radically changed our electoral spectrum, allowing rich people to have
unlimited power to influence elections.
The Citizen’s ruling by the Supreme Court has had a lasting negative
effect on our country. I suspect that
this latest case will unleash untold mayhem on our culture, allowing
corporations to refuse anything that they don’t like on religious grounds.
I can imagine that corporations founded by Jehovah’s
Witnesses might try to refuse to allow payment for blood transfusions on
similar grounds; or perhaps Amish corporations might try to refuse to pay for
transportation by other than horse and buggy.
As ridiculous as that sounds, these idle speculations travel the same
ground as Hobby Lobby is working in the case currently before the court.
As described in the 9th chapter of the Gospel
of John, Jesus healed the man born blind on the Sabbath. This was against the rules that the Pharisees
had created for the Jewish people.
Nevertheless, our Lord healed the man on the Sabbath, ultimately causing
him to be thrown out of the synagogue.
Rules are at issue. Should we
side with the Pharisees or the blind man?
That doesn’t seem to me to be a difficult choice. Jesus felt free to be the Son of God, and to
further his mission no matter what day it happened to be. When Jesus saw need, he met it. He didn’t ask what day it was and tell the
person in need to come back when the rules would apply; he simply did what he
needed to do, no matter what others might have thought. I think that is a great example for all of
us.