We went to vote in the primary last week. When I got to the polling place, I was asked for my drivers license as a form of identification. This will be mandatory in the general election, but it was started in the primary as optional. I offered the observation that is was a shame that we have to show our pictures in order to vote. One of the poll watchers seated at the table said to me: “This is because there are so many people who look like the president.” I was appalled at this remark and I told him that I thought it was disgusting that he should say such a thing.
It got me to thinking about how prevalent racism is in our society. The Jim Crow culture was challenged by the Civil Rights movement in the sixties and many of the overt laws that separated the races were swept away and many of our places of education were integrated, but we still have the nagging, constant problem of unstated racism that still lives in many, if not most of our hearts. That is what I experienced at the polling place last week. A not-so-subtle racist remark from someone who ought to know better, and also an unmasking of the reason for the imposition of picture identification at the polls: an attempt to discourage minority voters from exercising their franchise. It is supposed that many of them will vote to support the president.
The lesson from the eighth chapter of the Acts of the Apostles, where Philip is told by an angel to go to the chariot where an Ethiopian eunuch was riding and reading a passage from the prophet Isaiah. Philip joined the eunuch in the chariot and explained to him how the Isaiah passage was a prophecy about the coming of Jesus and his crucifixion and rising from the dead. The eunuch was impressed by this and wanted to be baptized. They stopped where there was some water, and Philip baptized the eunuch. This story impressed me because it is a story about two races meeting one another and sharing the story of Jesus life, death and resurrection. How powerful this is when we think of the pervasiveness of whiteness in our culture. How black congregations are looked at as anomalies, or are caricatured as people who are always singing spirituals and listening to fevered preachers. There are certainly congregations like that, but there are also many African-American people who worship in other congregations with other traditions.
I served as an interim rector at an African-American church in Charleston, West Virginia for a year and a half. These were some of the finest Christians that I have ever met. They had become a Jubilee congregation in the Diocese of West Virginia because of their wonderful outreach programs. A small congregation that did excellent work in taking care of the poor and the outcast in their city. I was proud of them and glad to be able to use my talents to lead them in their work. It is galling to me to think that these people would be targets of disenfranchisement at the polls. True, they aren’t in Pennsylvania, but the principle is the same. I know that the people in that congregation, and the myriad of other minority voters across the country will do what all of us do at the polls: vote for the people whom we think will do the best in our government for all of the people. That isn’t a racial thing at all, it is simply what we all want in our democracy. Isn’t it interesting how we try always to limit our democracy to those to whom we think are entitled to it? That would be the wealthy, the educated and the talented. We will find ways to limit the participation of others who don’t quite qualify.
That is what is so disgusting about the “voter identification” law. It is an attempt to limit participation in our government to those whom some people think will vote in the “proper” way. That flies in the face not only of our constitution, but also of our bible, where all people are accepted by our God because of the unlimited love that is expressed through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus. We all participate in that love, regardless of our race, our level of wealth and education or any other limiting categories. Thank God for that love that trumps all of our prejudice and selfishness and gives us finally the gift of each other in all of the ways that we show up.
Preach it brother!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Stan. I met you at St. Brendan's when you were here for the walkabout.
DeleteThe comment by the poll worker is indeed disgusting, and there is no place for racism in any form. However, I would also encourage the examination of other needs for the photo ID law - namely, limiting voting to those who have a right to do so.
ReplyDeleteOne of the hallmarks of our heritage is the right of citizens - of all backgrounds, ethnic origins and wealth - to determine our future. Yet there are those who would seek to circumvent even that basic requirement in order to further their own agendas. We all heard about the community group ACORN in 2008. Chicago has a stereotype for registering dead people for a reason.
I abhor racism in all forms, but I don't equate enforcing a law that applies to everyone equally with racism. Please don't let the inappropriate comments of one bigot erase the entire purpose of any of these laws.
I'm so glad to see this lively discussion to your post, Dad!
DeleteI agree with Mark that the law itself isn't inherently racist--yet it can have unintended consequences. While the voter ID law may apply to everyone equally, it is more challenging for some people to meet its requirements. (It's like that old adage that the law prohibiting people from sleeping under bridges applies to the rich and poor alike.) If you don't have and can't afford a driver's license, then there are extra steps you'll have to take to get a qualified ID to vote.
We may have some cases of voter fraud in this country (though I think the charges against ACORN are still in question--here's a link to a 2008 factcheck.org report on that: http://www.factcheck.org/2008/10/acorn-accusations/). It surprises me, though, that a few cases of voter fraud seem to be treated as more of a problem than low voter turn out in this country. The US Elections Project (http://elections.gmu.edu/Turnout_2012P.html) notes that 14.7 of eligible voters voted in PA's 2012 primary--and about 41% of eligible voters voted in the 2010 national election. My concern about PA's voter ID law is that it doesn't do much to fix what may be a small problem and seems to add to a very big problem.
Thanks, Jennie. I agree completely. I am aware that there was no inherent racist intent in the crafting of the voter ID law, but the consequences of it produce a climate where racist agenda can be furthered. That a republican poll watcher can say what he did to me is atrocious, in that he apparently thought that it was probable that I would agree with him!
DeleteJennifer, I agree that low voter turn-out is a problem, but I think the root of that issue is apathy rather than intimidation. Now, there may be parts of the country where intimidation truly is the factor and that is an entirely different cause that needs to be attacked.
DeleteI remember as a child thinking that voting was one of the most important things we could do and I just don't see that kind of attitude any longer - people don't feel that their vote makes a difference. I would love to see voter turnouts in the 70-80-90% range. I don't know how to do that any more than is already being done. I guess it goes along the same lines of voter education too - people just vote how they always do, without really looking into the issues, and that goes for both sides of the political spectrum.
Oh well....preaching to the choir! :-)
We are a preach to the choir kinda crowd, Mark--and that never stops us! :) Thanks for weighing in on this. I know what you mean about the importance of voting on the decline. I tend to think that's by design in some ways. Attempts to make voting easier, for example (like voting on-line or even changing the day to a Saturday when more can take the time) often rub up against well-funded special interests that benefit from low voter turn out. Then there's this: Jim Hightower, a fairly well-known, left of center pundit said "If God wanted us to vote, he'd have given us candidates." :)
DeleteNice to be connecting like this and I can't wait to meet you next time you head east! --Jennie
Heck - I'd be all for voting on Saturday! I've never even heard that proposed, by anyone on either side of the aisle. Voting online though....that doesn't strike me as a good idea. After all, many of the disenfranchised folks you may be talking about don't have ready access to online resources anyway. The potential for abuse in that method is immense. So I'll meet you halfway and move it to Saturday!
DeleteI'm definitely looking forward to meeting you all - with any luck it'll be in August!